SAINT INNOCENT,
APOSTLE TO AMERICA
Metropolitan
Innocent, also known as Father John Veniaminov, is perhaps the greatest
missionary of the Russian Orthodox church, and truly one of the ideal
missionary examples within all Christian history.
During
the 19th century, Innocent’s life and ministry left a lasting legacy on the
growing missionary activity of the Russian Orthodox church. From the time of
his departure to the Alaskan Islands in 1823, to the culmination of his
priestly ministry as Metropolitan of Moscow (the highest clerical rank in the
Russian church) in 1868, Innocent helped mold and influence the attitude of
this church towards its apostolic ministry.
Historical Background
In
the early 19th century, the Russian church underwent a spiritual renewal that
touched every aspect of her life. Inspired by a number of “spiritual elders”
(enlightened and holy monks), a number of the Russian faithful, and the church
at large, began to rediscover the fullness of the Orthodox faith and ultimately
felt the need to share it with others. Initial steps at evangelism turned
naturally to eastern Siberia and the lands beyond, where many Russian adventurers
and traders had begun to explore. These men often traveled not only in the name
of Imperial Russia, but also in the hopes of sharing the gospel with the
indigenous peoples. What could once be accomplished on a piecemeal basis,
however, soon proved difficult as colonies began to form in lands as far away
as Alaska. It was soon clear that these men needed the support and aid from the
clergy in Russia.
The
church sent missionary monks to the new land with a twofold mission: to act as
general overseers of the Russians (who, at times, had a low standard of
morality and often treated the natives inhumanely), as well as to enlighten the
pagans. In 1794, ten monks arrived in Alaska to begin their ministry.
Unfortunately, only a handful of them survived the rough new land, and over the
next thirty years, few missionaries volunteered to take their place.
The
idea of spreading the faith to such far off lands did not have widespread
appeal for many of the
faithful in Russia at this time. As one historian noted, “Service in Alaska was
voluntary and it was hard for the church to enlist volunteers for the onerous
assignment” (Smith 1980:12). Even when the Bishop of Irkutsk asked the clergy
of his diocese to volunteer for a post in Alaska, all turned down the call.
Tougher recruitment tactics seldom worked either. “The bishop then tried
selection by lot, following the manner of the election of Matthias in the Book
of Acts, but the deacon who was selected in this manner refused to go abroad,
preferring military service in the lower ranks as a penalty for his insubordination”
(Grigorieff 1977:19).
Call to Missions
This
was the situation when John Veniaminov first considered the task upon his
graduation from seminary. As a top student, Veniaminov was eligible to continue
his studies at the Moscow Theological Academy. He chose instead to marry the
daughter of a local cleric, be ordained a priest, and begin his ministry at the
parish level. As a young husband and new cleric in a comfortable parish, Father
John heard the request for missionaries and rejected the possibility as
impractical. He would later write in a journal, No matter what stories [I
heard} about America in general or about the Aleuts in particular, no matter
how he [an old Russian adventurer] tried to persuade me to go to Unalaska, I
remained deaf; none of his persuasion even touched me. Indeed, how could I - why
should I (humanly speaking) - have travelled God-knows-where when I had one
of the best parishes in the city, when I enjoyed the love of my parishioners
and the good graces of the authorities, when I already owned my own home and
had a larger income than
the salary being offered to whomever was assigned to Unalaska? (Garrett
1979:34).
Despite
his initial negative attitude, Father John remained open to the guidance of the
Holy Spirit. One day as he again listened to the old Russian adventurer’s
stories of how the native Aleuts longed
to hear the Word of God, something suddenly changed within him. He would later
write, “Blessed be the Name of the Lord! I began to burn with desire to
go to such a people! Even today I recall vividly the tortures I endured while
waiting impatiently to inform the bishop of my wish.” (Garrett 1979:34). Far
from taking credit for this radical change of heart, Father John gave all glory
and honor to God. May my own example serve as a new proof of the truth that the
“Lord guides a man safely in the way he should go,” and that each of us
servants of His Church is no more than an instrument in His hands. He saw fit
to establish my field of ministry in America - and that despite my opposition
(Garrett 1979:36). Such openness to the Spirit launched a forty-five year
missionary career which culminated in the founding of the Russian Orthodox
Mission Society in 1870.
Ministry among the Aleuts
On
May 7, 1823, Father John and his family (his wife, infant son, mother, and
brother) left their homeland and began the 2200-mile trip across Siberia and
the Pacific Ocean in order to reach their new home on the Aleutian Islands. One
of Father John’s first acts in this “remote corner of the earth” was to offer thanksgiving
to God by celebrating the Divine Liturgy. This became a momentous occasion, as
he enthusiastically noted in his diary how “for the first time since the birth
of Christ - in fact, from the creation of the world” the Eucharist was
celebrated in this new land (Garrett 1979:49). From the outset of his ministry,
Father John envisioned three initial goals: first, to visit all the people of
the surrounding islands; second, to establish a center where all the people
could listen to the word of God; and third, to learn the indigenous language
well enough to preach (Garrett 1979:51). Over the next ten years, Father John
and his family settled into their new home and faithfully served the Fox-Aleut
tribes. True to Orthodox tradition, he mastered the native tongue, turned his
attention to creating a writing system for the language, and then translated
parts of the Holy Scriptures and divine services for the people. As Father John
wrote in a letter to his bishop, During the three years I have been here, I
have considered my most important duty to be teaching the Word of God to the
flock entrusted to me - and this I have fulfilled to the best of my ability.
However, inasmuch as the Aleuts live scattered . . . over large distances, I
have also made translation my duty . . . I had no other object in translating
this
than that the Aleut who reads or listens . . . in his native tongue might
understand and learn
from it what he ought to believe and do for his salvation (Garrett 1979:74).
Father
John also produced a 1200-word Aleut-Russian dictionary and grammar book on the
Fox-Aleut
language, as well as a small catechetical booklet entitled, Indication of
the Way into the Kingdom of Heaven. In this booklet, Father John presented
the basic tenets of the Orthodox Christian faith in a simple way. Among other
things, he emphasized the importance of knowing and studying the Bible. He
wrote, Study diligently the foundations upon which our Orthodox Christian faith
is built, that is, the actual books of Holy Scripture. . . How many Christians
(or better put: how many of those who have received baptism in the name of
Jesus Christ) have perished and are even now perishing simply because they do
not and did not wish to pay attention to the foundations of our Orthodox faith?
Anyone who despises this duty will have no defense at the fearful Judgement . .
. Believe unconditionally, without doubt or speculation, in all that
the Scriptures teach. . . Finally, strive to possess and stir up within
yourself the desire to do what the Holy Scriptures teach. If you presently lack
such desire, fall down in fervent prayer before our Savior Jesus Christ and ask
Him to grant you this (Oleksa 1987:90-91).
The
booklet was so well written that the Holy Synod decided to publish it in
Russian and Slavonic, ultimately watching it go through forty-seven printings.
Clearly, this helped raise the spiritual commitment and missionary awareness of
the faithful back home and established Father John’s credibility as an
inspiring theologian. Father John’s respect for the culture of the Aleuts was
apparent in other ways as well. He conscientiously strove to retain the
positive aspects of their culture and reject only that which was completely
incompatible with Orthodoxy, By doing this, he helped the Aleuts take ownership
of their new faith. For example, when a discrepancy arose between Orthodox
tenets and the native practices of the people, Father John did not condemn
outright their way of life. Instead, he guided the people through education,
and allowed them to realize the incompatibility. By this method, the changes
emanated from the natives, instead of from their teacher. After ten years of
ministry among the Aleuts, the mission transferred Father John to Sitka, one of
the largest of the Vancouver islands. His success was apparent as “all the
inhabitants of the vast territory of his parish became Christians” (Grigorieff
1977:22).
Ministry Among the Thlingits
With
his move to Sitka in 1834, Father John began work anew among the warlike
Thlingit Indians. Again, one of his primary goals was to learn the new language
of the native people, create a writing system, and begin translating of the
Bible and services as soon as possible. This practice characterized his
life-long missionary goal. Even when he became a bishop with numerous
missionaries under his care, he encouraged all of his workers to learn the
language of their area as quickly as possible, translate at least one book of
the Scripture into the native language, and then teach at least fifty of the
Indians to read it (Grigorieff 1977:30).
While
Father John made monumental progress with the indigenous peoples, he also
realized his own
limitations, and learned to rely on God’s guidance and providence. Divine
intervention can vividly be seen in Father John’s ministry among the Thlingit
people. After spending several years among these fiercely independent people,
Father John learned their language, along with their traditions, beliefs, and customs.
He saw their deep spiritual need, and lamented that so many of them lived
entirely under the influence of shamans and medicine women. Indeed, the
Thlingit people seemed indifferent to any witness of the gospel. The crude and
unchristian example often set by the Russian traders and explorers made the Thlingit
tribe even more sure of their own spiritual independence. They saw no need or
value in believing in a faith that was shared by the Russians. As Father John
wrote, “This and other conditions served to check the Thlingits from embracing Christianity
. . . These obstacles would have continued indefinitely had not Providence sent
upon them an unheard of sickness [smallpox]” (Oleksa 1987:350). As a smallpox
epidemic ravaged and ultimately felled nearly half the tribe in just two
months, the only remedy the natives sought was the shaman. Nothing the shaman
did brought relief. The Thlingits noticed, however, that this disease did not
harm any of the Russians. Finally, they allowed a doctor from the colonies to
vaccinate any who were interested. “Finally Indians came from other villages to
be vaccinated,” Fr. John noted. “One must not forget that but three months
previous to this, no man and no earthly power could have compelled them to take
vaccination” (Oleksa 1987:351). From such an historical circumstance, the door
for the gospel edged open.
Father
John reported, "After so memorable an event in the annals of the Thlingit
history I offered my services to them for their spiritual welfare. For, after
so striking and eloquent persuasion it was not so hard for me to convince them
of the truth of the Gospel. At any rate I had many opportunities
to talk to them. They received me, not as their enemy or as one who wished them
harm, but as a man of superior knowledge. They received me with marked consideration
and listened to me with patience and reverence, and in return told me of their traditions,
customs and beliefs" (Oleksa 1987:352).
Father John’s timing was perfect. Several days before the epidemic broke out, he had planned on visiting the Thlingits to share his understanding of the gospel with them. How providential this was that circumstances prevented him from doing so. He reported: Had I commenced my work a few days prior to the appearance of smallpox, it is almost certain that the full blame for this would have fallen upon me, as a Shaman brought in by the Russians who wanted to destroy them. Moreso because before my time no Russian missionary had ever set foot at their door either for preaching or in idle curiosity (Oleksa 1987:352). Thus, by God’s hand, the Thlingits became more receptive to the message which Father John brought. Even though it still took years for the gospel to penetrate and transform the tribe, this occasion proved to be a turning point for him and other future missionaries.
Return to Russia
Missionary Bishop
Innocent
returned to his new diocese in 1841 and fervently continued his work among the
native peoples. One of his first goals as bishop was to make a fourteen month,
round-trip journey throughout his entire diocese, encompassing more than 14,850
miles by ship, kayak, dog-sled, and foot. During one stretch of this trip, he
recalled how he had traveled over 3300 miles by dog sled and reindeer. Such
travel was extremely tiring and dangerous, particularly since the “dense, wolf-infested
woods” provided constant distractions for the dogs. Innocent described that if
“in a moment of inattention the driver should relax the reins just as the lead
dogs caught an alluring scent across their path, then the traveler could be
overturned and dragged for miles helplessly crying ‘Ko! Ko! Ko!’ to convince
the beasts to stop” (Garrett 1979:168).
These
trying travels reminded Innocent of his early years as a missionary, when he
traversed hundreds of miles in the open sea with only a small one-man kayak.
Back then, he spent more than fifteen hours motionless in a kayak in near
freezing weather in order to reach his parishioners. Innocent established a
number of goals for himself and all the clergy from the beginning of his episcopal
ministry. He emphasized the following priorities: 1) to confirm the piety of
the flock, made up largely of newly-converted peoples not yet firm in the
faith; 2) to bring back those gone astray or now straying from the path of
faith (i.e. those who have returned to their former shamanism and those who
have forgotten the fear of God to walk according to the will of their hearts);
and 3) to spread the light of the Good News among those lost in the darkness of
paganism (Garrett 1979:189). To meet these goals, Innocent issued creative
pastoral instructions to both the clergy and lay leaders. He increased the role
of the laity by ordering “pious and informed” laymen to administer the
sacrament of baptism in the absence of a priest. (Whenever a priest would visit
such villages, they would then complete the baptismal prayers and chrismate the
newly initiated.) Along with this role, Innocent sought to create a body of
laymen and women called “readers,” who would conduct weekly worship services in
the absence of a priest. To the clergy, he emphasized their pedagogical and
homiletical duty: Woe to him, who has been called and ordained to preach the
Word of God and who is not doing it . . . We as pastors, as teachers, as heirs
of the apostles, have to keep up with our calling, and that means we have to
teach. Otherwise we are like pagan priests, just performers of mysteries and
rituals (Grigorieff 1977:29-30).
He
also emphasized the need to meet the people at their level and stressed the
need to teach and preach with simplicity. In explaining religious teachings,
one must speak deliberately, clearly, distinctly, and as succinctly as possible.
Otherwise your sermon will have little effect . . . to explain that all the
teachings of Jesus Christ tell us to repent, to believe in Him and to have
unselfish, pure love for Him and for all people (Grigorieff 1977:30). By the
end of his first decade as bishop, Innocent reported back to the Holy Synod
that over sixty churches and chapels had been built, with over 23,100
Christians in his diocese of Kamchatka, the Kurile and the Aleutian
Islands. Along with this, his most exciting achievement was the establishment
of a local seminary for the training of native priests (Grigorieff 1977:33,34).
Over
the next seventeen years, Innocent continued to act as a missionary bishop
within three other newly established dioceses in eastern Siberia. Although he
slowly moved away from his initial work in Alaska, his love and concern for
that land never waned. In fact, following the sale of Alaska to the United States
in 1867, Innocent prophetically envisioned the future of the Orthodox mission
in America: I see in this event one of the providential ways by which our
Orthodoxy can penetrate into the United States, where it already has started to
attract serious attention. If asked, I would recommend the following measures .
. . A new bishop who knows the English language should be appointed to America.
His staff should be manned by people who also
know the English language . . . Ordain to the holy priesthood American citizens
who had
converted to Orthodoxy; the bishop and the clergy of all our parishes should be
permitted to celebrate the Divine Liturgy and other church services in the
English language. It is self-evident that the service books should be
translated into the English language for this purpose (Gregorieff 1977:35). Once
again, Innocent exemplified constant concern and respect for the native peoples
of different cultures. He sought to contextualize Orthodoxy into whatever new
settings the faith found itself.
Orthodox Mission Society
In
1868, after twenty-seven years as a missionary bishop, and forty-five years
within the missionary field, Innocent returned to Russia in order to be
elevated as Metropolitan of Moscow, the highest ecclesiastical office within
the Russian church. During those years as head of the church, Innocent achieved
a life-long dream of founding the Russian Orthodox Mission Society. His plan
and vision for this society was to help support and direct all the missionary
endeavors of the church. He noted in the inaugural meeting of the society: In
comparison with the number [of unchurched people] we have very few missions,
and the ones which have already been established
need funds in order to maintain and expand their activities. The holiness of
this work and its great importance . . . are obvious, and our chief source of
funds for this development must be the concern and zeal of all Orthodox Christians.
The Missionary Society is open to all - rich and poor alike. The comfort of service
this great work provides is given to anyone who wishes and is able to do so according
to his abilities (Garrett 1979:306).
Along
with raising funds, he saw a primary focus of the society to be prayer: First
and foremost, we must pray. . . In the matter of conversion, prayer
becomes the means itself - and a most effectual of means, for without
prayer one cannot expect success even under the most perfect of circumstances.
Thus, it is not our missionaries alone who must pray. No, we their brethren
must further their work by our own prayers. And what ought we to pray for?
First, that the Lord will send workers into His harvest; second, that He will
open the hearts of those who listen to the Word of the Gospel; third, that He
will increase our Society’s numbers more and more; and finally, that He will
strengthen and confirm in us the desire we all now feel to further this work to
the attaining of our goal (Garrett 1979:309).
Over
the next forty-five years, the Orthodox Mission Society greatly influenced the
missionary work of the church until the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. During
its existence, hundreds of missionaries were sent and supported throughout the
vast lands of Siberia and the eastern end of the Russian Empire, as well as Alaska,
Japan, China, and Korea.
Conclusion
On
March 31, 1878, Metropolitan Innocent died at the age of eighty-two. The
church, by canonizing him “Apostle to America,” proclaimed him to be truly one
of the greatest missionary figures in church history. As one author noted, no
other person in modern times has come close to matching the missionary feats of
Saint Innocent. He has been called a “renaissance man” by some. He was a master
carpenter, watchmaker, inventor, linguist, original translator, noted
ethnographer, sociologist, teacher, and scholar. But for all these talents,
were it not for his first calling, as missionary priest and bishop, none of
these talents would have been fully utilized (Fester 1992:31).
Through
the life of Innocent, the church once again found a stalwart champion of
Orthodoxy who sought to lift up her faithful missionary tradition for all the
world to see. His life and work followed and propelled forward the path of his
Orthodox predecessors, and thus fulfilled one of the greatest responsibilities
of the church - her missionary call.
*Source:
Missionaries,
Monks and Martyrs: Making Disciples of All Nations by Fr. Luke Veronis. Light and Life
Publishing Company, 1994.
Works by Saint Innocent: